As said the pitch remains the same as your only reducing the diameter & not changing the angle of the blades, re ratio it would go from 1.4 x 45 to around 1.53 x 41.
For the 445:
Diameter: 1.77" x 1.4 pitch ratio = 2.478" of pitch
Now take the 2.479 (since pitch remains the same) and devide by 1.614"(41mm) and you come up with a new ratio of 1.535 (assuming I did my math correctly)
So Chris. Any potential problems with decreasing a props diameter significantly?? I've been told prop walk could be a problem with some props??
For the 445:
Diameter: 1.77" x 1.4 pitch ratio = 2.478" of pitch
Now take the 2.479 (since pitch remains the same) and devide by 1.614"(41mm) and you come up with a new ratio of 1.535 (assuming I did my math correctly)
So Chris. Any potential problems with decreasing a props diameter significantly?? I've been told prop walk could be a problem with some props??
Most likely you would get more lift because you change the shape of the prop I doubt prop walk would be any different I would not go any higher then 1.7 Pitch ratio
When working on props and belt sanding make sure to use the shop vacuum conected to the sander to suck the dust away from you. I wash my hands often also when doing detail prop work. Hey just like anything else........ light fuse and get away fast Ha.
I always use protection hehe.
I have to buy a belt sander cause i spend to many hours on a prop.
I thought our (rc boat) props were progressive pitch not fixed pitch. I also thought this is why detounging a prop is advantageous to high end speed. It was my understanding the tounge area has the lowest pitch and becomes a limiting factor for top speed. I guess that doesn't mean the pitch will change in the middle of the blade, but what about at the outer edge?
Also why would you reduce a 47 mm prop to 41 when you can get an x442?
I just picked up an x447 and was thinking about spooning the tips and cupping them to really push a p-ltd motor, will probably end up back cutting also, but i'm gonna run eagletree on it stock to get some baseline numbers before i start any work. Darin Jordan has me convinced that higher rpm is not the absolute answer in going faster. I'm thinking an 1800 kv proboat motor with a slightly larger prop can be competitive with the AQ 2030 motor spinning a smaller prop. I know some people running an m445 on the 2030 motor so i figure i can get away with an x447 on an 1800 kv motor if i do a little work to it. Races are won and lost in the corners just as much as the straights and it is my opinion that a larger prop should be able to carry more speed in the corner and accelerate harder out of one as well. I haven't done any real world testing on this theory so at this time it is simply that, theory and speculation. Any thoughts on this prop guys?
Comment