Mark
FYI, TP Motor news......Changes to face plate!
Collapse
X
-
Here is a TP 5860 650KV in an Insane 45" mono. This motor has the 6 bolt star pattern. This pattern made me have to drill new holes in my motor mount which accommodated a 40 and 50mm bolt 4 star pattern. I hope they go the 4 bolt route on these motors too.
Mark
-
Ray,Originally posted by ray schrauwen View PostWhat length stud do you use or does it vary?
What tool do you use to tighten the nut when motor is in tight areas?
This is attractive for a hull I can use for both p-limited and p mono. Just add a tail ring support.
Some answers :
#1] Length of stud is determined by Inter-Ocular Trauma Test : I just stare at a 3mm bolt (in the vice) and when an appropriate length hits me between the eyes I grab the Dremel. Gill is correct ; not so long as to short out on stator windings
#2] 'Cause you're on of my fav's, here some top secrets :
Nut tightening / removal essentials :
a. Home made angle un-nutting / re-nutting thingie (handle+old flex shaft with 7/32" socket goobered on)
b.and most important 7/32" (or 5.5mm) mini-wrench
DSC07760.JPG
Mini wrench to apply final tightening or break loose already tightened nut:
DSC07761.JPG
Flex thingie in action:
DSC07763.JPG
BUT WAIT !!!! No need to home-make the flex thingie !!
SHAZAM : Now available from your choice of Chinese Goodie Vendors :
DSC07766.JPG
Yowzah
DSC07765.JPG
You're Welcome
2008 NAMBA P-Mono & P-Offshore Nat'l 2-Lap Record Holder; '15 P-Cat, P-Ltd Cat 2-Lap
2009/2010 NAMBA P-Sport Hydro Nat'l 2-Lap Record Holder, '13 SCSTA P-Ltd Cat High Points
'11 NAMBA [P-Ltd] : Mono, Offshore, OPC, Sport Hydro; '06 LSO, '12,'13,'14 P Ltd Cat /Mono
Comment
-
Funny Tony..lol.....a piece of silicone tube sometimes helps to start screwing the nut in tight places like in my riggers.GillGO FAST AND TURN RIGHT !
www.grsboats.com.br
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by grsboats View PostFunny Tony..lol.....a piece of silicone tube sometimes helps to start screwing the nut in tight places like in my riggers.Gill
#1 tip
2008 NAMBA P-Mono & P-Offshore Nat'l 2-Lap Record Holder; '15 P-Cat, P-Ltd Cat 2-Lap
2009/2010 NAMBA P-Sport Hydro Nat'l 2-Lap Record Holder, '13 SCSTA P-Ltd Cat High Points
'11 NAMBA [P-Ltd] : Mono, Offshore, OPC, Sport Hydro; '06 LSO, '12,'13,'14 P Ltd Cat /Mono
Comment
-
Comment
-
I'll give it some thought - Right now I'm dialing in my Vac-U-PickleOriginally posted by RaceMechaniX View Post
DSC00788-1.JPG2008 NAMBA P-Mono & P-Offshore Nat'l 2-Lap Record Holder; '15 P-Cat, P-Ltd Cat 2-Lap
2009/2010 NAMBA P-Sport Hydro Nat'l 2-Lap Record Holder, '13 SCSTA P-Ltd Cat High Points
'11 NAMBA [P-Ltd] : Mono, Offshore, OPC, Sport Hydro; '06 LSO, '12,'13,'14 P Ltd Cat /Mono
Comment
-
I see no reason for one piece can being superior. Lehner has been doing it the old way (precisely) for quite some time.Originally posted by Shooter View PostI completely agree. The one pc is far superior. Seems a lot of these motor companies are going this direction for cost savings.
The only advantage to one piece cans is lower production costs. The front bearing on some is a bear to replace. With a removable front plate bearings take no time to replace and the rotor doesn't have to come out chancing damage to it's wrap.Last edited by ray schrauwen; 12-17-2016, 12:17 PM.
Nortavlag Bulc 
Comment
-
Comment
-
Check out post #7. One piece cans are much more expensive to make. Multi-piece types can simply use extruded tubing for the body. End bells are cheap and easy to make in bulk on CNC machinery. This is a more versatile manufacturing method, easier to respond to orders with multiple length cans. Neu started in business with one-piece cans because Steve believed they were better, but they reduced cost and delivery time by stopping the practice.I see no reason for one piece can being superior. Lehner has been doing it the old way (precisely) for quite some time....
IMG_3196.jpg
Of course, both types will work.
.Last edited by Fluid; 12-26-2016, 10:51 AM.ERROR 403 - This is not the page you are looking for
Comment
-
Not sure how the post above fits in the thread, but I'll bite. What really matters to many is reliability, efficiency, and cost. For top speed, light weight should not be a goal by itself - to balance lift you may need weight and better to have it in essential parts than to have to add lead. For racing, speed is usually secondary to handling and the ability to finish. Unfortunately, many here seem to be unaware of these, or oblivious to them....
.ERROR 403 - This is not the page you are looking for
Comment
Comment