Originally posted by Rumdog
View Post
Best bang for the buck, period. I will likely upgrade from my FlySky GT3B soon - for the better daylight vis and LIPO batt. But lack of range has not been an issue with my old GT3B TX or any of the $7 FlySky recievers. Santee Lakes lake #1 measures 1/4 mile long, and I have yet to have any reception problems.I got tired of crashing my 3D airplanes flown using Futaba FM so I quit that RC sport 5 years ago. Now with the excellent 2.4 G Hobby King HK 60F transmitter (FlySky relabled) & HK 60F 6 channel reciever in my shop, I may return to flying. For now I'll keep using it with my sailboats. Note: IMO the latest 2.4 G transmitters have made the seperation of air & surface TXs a moot point. That and the fact that the nearest flying field is over 2 miles away from my boat pond.
But, if I'm imsinformed about the surface/air issue, please feel free to enlighten me. JIM

but if you knew wtf you were talking about, you'd know there are many companies of "douchebags" which are employed in our area for this exact type of abatement.
Like I posted earlier this mornin up inthe thread, Best deal for 60 bones!!! 

Comment