R-42 Twin Beast
Collapse
X
-
So this is where I eat CROW. I put the hull on a sheet of glass after work and Jay and Oscar are correct. Both sponsons are even with each other and the last step is 'hooked'(for lack of a better term), just like the famed Cheetah hulls.Originally posted by Fluid View PostNeither of the R-42s I've owned had the right sponson deeper in the water than the left - they are both exactly the same depth from the tunnel bottoms. And both sponsons had a slight amount of hook designed into the last step. Has Andy changed the boat's design in the last two years?
.
There is a pic either on here or in a private e-mail of one of the hulls which I stated had a deeper step and this one in particular was what came up in discussion with Andy and perhaps he thought I was talking about the 'hook'.
Anyway, my apologies for misleading the thread and Jay and Oscarel. So here are pics of the said 'hook:

Comment
-
-
I think you gonna wanna be down in the sponsons and as close to the inside as possible
Attached FilesKeith Geusic #677 NAMBA District 19 Seaducer Gas MONO, Aquacraft Revolt Fe30, 30in Max Cat scratch Built
Comment
-
-
Flood tubes guys, flood tubes are the plan. Versatility is what I am after here. But I will keep things as low as possible including the motors. Still brainstorming there.Originally posted by high-tech View PostI think you gonna wanna be down in the sponsons and as close to the inside as possible
Thinking half tall mounts but with rear supports.
Comment
-
Vertically adjustable struts can be a big advantage. Too many twins mount their stingers too low on the sponsons, ending up with either too much lift or the inability to unload big props. Saw this again today at the SAWs, the lack of vertical adjustment limits potential boat speed. Good plan Shawn!
.ERROR 403 - This is not the page you are looking for
Comment
-
Thanks Jay, oddly enough I think I have been doing the opposite. I was happily running 5017 props on my Shocker(my first brushless twin build) with good temps and amp draw.Originally posted by Fluid View PostVertically adjustable struts can be a big advantage. Too many twins mount their stingers too low on the sponsons, ending up with either too much lift or the inability to unload big props. Saw this again today at the SAWs, the lack of vertical adjustment limits potential boat speed. Good plan Shawn!
.
I have had same with my Fantasm but recently got it aired out better and now need smaller props as now they dig in more.
These are the issues I have run into with 'fixed' stingers and here had the chance to try something different.
Comment
-
I made a template so that I can take it to the drafting table to lay out the rudder/struts


And you can see I have a motor template stuck in there. I am waiting on those till the hardware is mounted to get a better fix on motor location. I am very close there as I did a previous CG layout.
So here is my blank slate:

And the question is; Whether or not to splay the struts to match up to the top deck curvature or do the whole layout 'square to the world'?

Comment
-
I'm thinking splayed, for this reason. It will give you another slight dimention in adjustability, being side to side. Weather it makes any difference or not, who knows?
Comment
-
Originally posted by srislash View PostFlood tubes guys, flood tubes are the plan.
Hi Shawn,
Please post pic's of your flood tube setup when you get there. This idea is new to me and I'm not sure how it works. I've seen Rockstar's pic's of his set up on his big mono but I believe he did a quick write up and there were no detailed pic's of how to set it up and I'm not sure I understand advantage/disadvantages of it. Thanks JJ.
Comment


Comment